I was originally really excited about the possibility of the Olympic games coming to Chicago, but I never quite felt the spirit of the city's support. And, after considering the rough economic times the U.S. has been going through, I wasn't quite sure that I was ready to fork over additional funds. People are saying that they don't quite understand why Chicago wasn't chosen. After viewing the presentations by Chicago and Rio de Janeiro, it seems pretty clear to me. Rio gave solid reasons of how Rio is different from any other bidding city. Chicago's presentation, sorry to say, seemed a bit flat to me. It didn't quite represent what Chicago has to offer that you can't find anywhere else. It seemed to speak more to an American audience than an international audience. I would want to know, what makes Chicago different enough for me to fly half way across the world to want to visit. There are so many people in Chicago that speak different languages. Why wasn't that represented in the videos? Based on purely the videos—which I admit, isn't the best way to pick—I'd have picked Rio too. Check out Rio de Janeiro Blue by Randy Crawford on iTunes.
Anyway, I love Chicago, but unfortunately, I think it came up a bit short on the presentation. Check out Chicago's as well as the presentation of the other bidding cities to see how they compare/contrast from ABC 7 Chicago.
Here's one of several of Chicago's bidding presentations. They're not that much different from each other, but you can view the others at ABC 7 Chicago. The bidding presentation for Rio de Janeiro. This is at least an hour long video, but is interesting.You can also skip ahead within the video.
Wow! It's already changed on Wikipedia!











Recent Comments